Abstract
Nigeria is still battling with the problem of insurgency. Pictures of bloody acts of violence by insurgents are shown. Insurgency attacks cause serious destruction of lives and properties in Nigeria and have continued to cause fear, anxiety, anger, sorrow and pain to the people of Nigeria. On daily basis, one continues to hear some sad news of mass killings of human beings and destruction of valuable properties. Thousands of innocent people have been displaced, kidnapped and taken to some unknown destinations by these insurgents. If people keep quiet to this situation, it means encouraging the insurgents. Furthermore, people engage in speeches to describe insurgency as a way of finding a lasting solution and to stop the insurgents from their acts of violence. Speeches on insurgency are full of inflammatory verbal attacks on perceived opponents. Hence, this paper examines A Speech Act Analysis of Speeches on Insurgency in Nigeria with a view to finding out the speech acts and linguistic features that characterize the speeches made by the government representatives and the insurgent groups. The speech act presents and documents locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts that convey the intention of speakers in insurgency speeches. In an attempt to carry out the analysis, the researcher randomly collected twenty speeches on insurgency from ten newspapers. Instances of utterances/statements made by the government representatives and the insurgent groups form the 8 data for the study. These utterances were analyzed with the aim of revealing their speech act import. The study adopted a qualitative descriptive research method. The speech act theory as modified by Searle (1969) serves as the theoretical framework. The findings reveal that expressive, directive, commissive, assertive and declarative are found in the utterances credited to the speakers but the declarative dominates. Moreover, the following forceful modal verbs in the utterances mark the speech act categories: “will”, “must”, “do”, “shall”, “kill”, “destroy”, “die”, “wipe”, “kidnap”. In conclusion, utterances made during insurgency served as weapons of negotiation, dialogue, intimidation, blackmail, incitement and coercion and thus created an atmosphere of fear and anxiety within the country. Based on this, the paper recommends that language users or communicators on either side of contention must think before they speak, such speech should be devoid of rage, emotion, irrationality, but must reflect calm, reality and humility. Speakers should use transformational language that can impact positively on their readers/listeners and the society at large.
Background of the Study
Students’ attitudes toward practical skill training are vital to the success of vocational e...
Background of the study
Every country places a significant emphasis on the education of its educational system. A...
Background of the Study
In today’s competitive business environment, personal branding and self-presentation are essential assets f...
Abstract: Integrating project management skills into technical training is essential for pr...
ABSTRACT: The Role of Sustainability Certifications in Vocational Training is increasingly significant as industries prioritize sustainable pr...
Background of the Study
Agricultural cooperatives play an essential role in supporting small-scale farmers by providing...
ABSTRACT
The design of proposed Modern Bus Terminal at Obalende employs the use of thin-shell concrete structures in order to provide max...
Dementia is a growing global health challenge, affecting millions of elderly...
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PROTEST MOVEMENTS IN NIGERIA: FROM ABA WOMEN'S RIOT TO ENDBADGOVERNANCE
Chapte...
Chapter One: Introduction
1.1 Background of the Study
Religious media advertising is a unique form of communication that integr...