Abstract
Nigeria is still battling with the problem of insurgency. Pictures of bloody acts of violence by insurgents are shown. Insurgency attacks cause serious destruction of lives and properties in Nigeria and have continued to cause fear, anxiety, anger, sorrow and pain to the people of Nigeria. On daily basis, one continues to hear some sad news of mass killings of human beings and destruction of valuable properties. Thousands of innocent people have been displaced, kidnapped and taken to some unknown destinations by these insurgents. If people keep quiet to this situation, it means encouraging the insurgents. Furthermore, people engage in speeches to describe insurgency as a way of finding a lasting solution and to stop the insurgents from their acts of violence. Speeches on insurgency are full of inflammatory verbal attacks on perceived opponents. Hence, this paper examines A Speech Act Analysis of Speeches on Insurgency in Nigeria with a view to finding out the speech acts and linguistic features that characterize the speeches made by the government representatives and the insurgent groups. The speech act presents and documents locutionary, illocutionary and perlocutionary acts that convey the intention of speakers in insurgency speeches. In an attempt to carry out the analysis, the researcher randomly collected twenty speeches on insurgency from ten newspapers. Instances of utterances/statements made by the government representatives and the insurgent groups form the 8 data for the study. These utterances were analyzed with the aim of revealing their speech act import. The study adopted a qualitative descriptive research method. The speech act theory as modified by Searle (1969) serves as the theoretical framework. The findings reveal that expressive, directive, commissive, assertive and declarative are found in the utterances credited to the speakers but the declarative dominates. Moreover, the following forceful modal verbs in the utterances mark the speech act categories: “will”, “must”, “do”, “shall”, “kill”, “destroy”, “die”, “wipe”, “kidnap”. In conclusion, utterances made during insurgency served as weapons of negotiation, dialogue, intimidation, blackmail, incitement and coercion and thus created an atmosphere of fear and anxiety within the country. Based on this, the paper recommends that language users or communicators on either side of contention must think before they speak, such speech should be devoid of rage, emotion, irrationality, but must reflect calm, reality and humility. Speakers should use transformational language that can impact positively on their readers/listeners and the society at large.
Abstract
Instructing library users on effective utilization of information resources and services could not be over emphasized in tertiar...
Background of the Study
Crime is a public wrong. It is an act of offense which violates the law of the state and is stro...
Abstract
This study focused on the Entrepreneurship competency required by business Education student in establishing sm...
ABSTRACT
Risk if not well managed could lead to collapse for most organisations especially those whose core business dea...
INTRODUCTION
National Economic Empowerment Development strategy (NEEDS) is described as a Nigeria’s plan for prosp...
Abstract
The aim of embarking on this study was to provide a well detailed account on the Impact of Radio Nigeria Enugu‟s awareness campa...
ABSTRACT
The online clearance system is an internet-based study initiative that will help facilitate the queuing system in the clearance...
ABSTRACT
In spite of their immeasurable benefits to life sustenance, the sustainable management of forest and forest re...
Abstract
Croton zambesicus Linn (Euphorbiaceae) is a highly valued medicinal plant in Nigeria and West African sub-region. It is used by...
INTRODUCTION
Tourism is a short term movement of people to destination outside their residential areas...